Negotiate Scholarship Offer European University 2026

Reviewed by Saumitra Rajput

Founder, Kadamb Overseas · 14+ years Europe education expertise · Ahmedabad

Last reviewed: May 23, 2026

[OK] Verified accurate for 2026

🕑 24 min read

Table of Contents

1. Can you really negotiate a European scholarship? (Yes, with conditions)

2. When negotiation is possible: the 4 mandatory pre-conditions

3. The 5 leverage points that actually move stipend decisions

4. Success rates by university tier (real Kadamb data 2014-2026)

5. 7-step process to negotiate your scholarship offer

6. Email Template 1: Counter-offer (with a competing scholarship in hand)

7. Email Template 2: No counter-offer, financial-need appeal

8. Email Template 3: Last-resort emotional appeal (use sparingly)

9. What TO say in negotiation emails (and what NEVER to say)

10. TU Munich, WU Vienna, KU Leuven: where to email and who replies

11. How to handle “We cannot increase the amount” responses

12. Time pressure tactics and deadline extension requests

13. The rare case where negotiation lowers your offer

14. Tax implications of a negotiated stipend (Germany 25% rule, Austria, Belgium)

15. Frequently Asked Questions

16. Get your scholarship negotiation reviewed by Kadamb Overseas

Can You Really Negotiate a European Scholarship? (Yes, With Conditions)

The myth among Indian study-abroad applicants is that European scholarships are fixed — DAAD pays €992/month, Erasmus Mundus pays €1,400/month, KU Leuven Science@Leuven is €10,000/year, take it or leave it. That is half-true. The headline stipend on the scholarship webpage is fixed because it comes from a fixed budget line. But scholarships in Europe rarely come alone. Most admitted Indian students at the Masters and PhD level get a bundle: a base tuition waiver, a monthly stipend, a one-time relocation grant, sometimes a research/conference travel allowance, sometimes a thesis-completion bonus, sometimes a teaching assistantship top-up. The bundle is negotiable, even when the headline figure is not.

In 12+ years guiding Indian students to Europe, Saumitra Rajput and the Kadamb Overseas team have negotiated higher packages for roughly 1 in 4 clients who tried — and we strongly recommend trying, because the downside is almost always zero. European universities are not Indian government bodies; a respectful, evidence-backed negotiation email does not damage your offer. We have negotiation case studies on KU Leuven (₹2.1L/year added as research-travel grant), WU Vienna (€2,400 one-time relocation bump), TU Munich (DAAD top-up via the Deutschlandstipendium combination), and even the notoriously fixed ETH Excellence Scholarship (added thesis-completion bonus).

This guide is the exact playbook we use. It works because it is grounded in how European scholarship committees actually evaluate appeals — which is very different from how an MBA admissions consultant in the US would tell you to negotiate.

When Negotiation Is Possible: the 4 Mandatory Pre-Conditions

You can only negotiate if all four of these are true. If any one is false, you are not negotiating — you are begging, and committees ignore begging.

The 7-day window is critical. We see Indian students submit panicked negotiation emails on the day before the deadline — these are read in a 30-second skim by an over-worked scholarship coordinator who clicks “decline”. Negotiation must happen with at least one full business week between your email and the deadline. If you are within the 7-day window, your first email should be a deadline extension request (template later in this post), not a negotiation.

There is also a fifth, soft pre-condition: you must not have already accepted the offer. Once you click “Accept” or sign the funding contract, your leverage drops to roughly 5% — at that point you can only request top-ups, not base-stipend increases.

The 5 Leverage Points That Actually Move Stipend Decisions

Indian students often try to negotiate using arguments that do not resonate with European committees. “I need more money because India is expensive” is not a leverage point — Europe is more expensive than India and committees know it. “My family will struggle to send me” is not a leverage point — committees know this from the financial-need form you already filled. Here are the 5 leverage points that actually work, ranked by effectiveness in our Kadamb client data 2014-2026:

Leverage 1: A competing offer from a peer-tier university (success rate ~60%)

The most powerful lever, by a wide margin. If you have a written offer from a directly comparable university, you can ask the target university to match or improve. Comparable is the operative word. A €2,000/month offer from ETH Zürich is comparable to a €1,400/month offer from TU Munich (peer technical universities, peer ranking). An offer from a private university in Cyprus is not comparable to TU Munich.

We have seen TU Munich match an EPFL offer twice in three attempts, by adding a research assistantship rather than touching the base scholarship. KU Leuven matched a TU Delft offer once, by adding a one-time €1,500 relocation grant.

Leverage 2: Documented exceptional financial need (success rate ~35%)

Not “my family is middle-class” — that is everyone. Documented exceptional need means: a parent who lost their job in the last 12 months (with a termination letter), a medical emergency in the family (with hospital bills), a single-parent household with the other parent deceased (with death certificate), or a sibling already in international education (with that sibling’s tuition-fee receipts). European committees take documented hardship seriously — Germany in particular has a strong tradition of need-based assistance through the DAAD STIBET-III hardship fund and Studierendenwerk emergency grants.

Leverage 3: Research alignment with a specific lab (success rate ~30%)

If your background tightly aligns with a specific lab’s current funded project, you can ask the lab PI to add you as a Hilfskraft (student research assistant) on the project, which adds €450-€900/month on top of your scholarship. This works at TU Munich, RWTH Aachen, TU Berlin, KU Leuven, EPFL, ETH, and most German/Swiss research universities. It does NOT work at most Italian, Spanish, or French universities where the funding structure is different.

Leverage 4: Lab-specific equipment or travel costs (success rate ~25%)

Some research benefits from conference travel, specialised lab consumables (cell cultures, robotics components), or computing credits (AWS, Azure). If your thesis topic requires these, you can ask for a thesis-completion grant of €1,000-€5,000. This is most successful at PhD level but works for some Research-Masters programmes too.

Leverage 5: Alumni network plays (success rate ~15%)

A reference letter from an alumnus who is now a notable professional (research-group head, partner at a top firm, founder) can be attached to a negotiation email as additional justification. This is the lowest-effectiveness lever but the easiest to execute if you have the network. We at Kadamb Overseas often arrange alumni introductions for our clients — our placed alumni at TU Munich, KU Leuven, WU Vienna, and EPFL are usually willing to write a short supporting note.

Success Rates by University Tier (Real Kadamb Data 2014-2026)

A few patterns from our data:

• Tier 1 success is low but non-zero. ETH and EPFL almost never raise base scholarships, but they will sometimes add a one-time thesis bonus. Worth a polite single email.
• Tier 3 success rate is highest because regional universities have more discretionary funds per student. We strongly recommend negotiating at Polish, Estonian, Czech, and smaller Italian regional universities.
• Tier 4 (private business schools) is a different animal. They negotiate like US business schools — they expect counter-offers and have explicit “scholarship matching” desks. If you are admitted to IE Business School and Bocconi MBA, you can typically extract a 15-25% increase from whichever you pick second.

For a deeper look at what scholarship structures Tier-1 European programs offer, see our Erasmus Mundus 2026 guide for Indian students and our breakdown of SC/ST/OBC scholarships in Europe.

7-Step Process to Negotiate Your Scholarship Offer

Here is the exact 7-step workflow Kadamb Overseas uses with every Masters and PhD client who has received a fundable offer.

Step 1: Re-read the offer letter line by line (Day 0)

The offer letter contains the negotiation parameters. Look for: scholarship name, paying body, base amount, duration, conditions, deadline to accept, scholarship coordinator contact email, appeal/review clause (if any). Note all of this in a spreadsheet. Crucially, look for the phrase “subject to availability of funds” — this indicates a discretionary budget that can sometimes be increased.

Step 2: Identify the correct contact person (Day 1)

The single most common mistake is emailing the admissions office. The admissions office processed your application — they do not control the scholarship budget. The right contact is the scholarship coordinator or funding office. At TU Munich it is the TUM Global & Alumni Office (international.scholarships@tum.de). At WU Vienna it is the Scholarships & Awards desk (scholarships@wu.ac.at). At KU Leuven it is the International Office’s scholarship desk (scholarship@kuleuven.be). At ETH it is ETH Studienfinanzierung. At KTH it is the KTH Scholarship Office.

Step 3: Gather your evidence (Day 2-3)

Pull together: any competing offer letters (PDF), documented financial hardship if relevant (PDF), a 1-page summary of your research alignment with the target lab, any alumni reference letters. Save everything in a single email-ready folder.

Step 4: Draft your negotiation email using one of the 3 templates below (Day 4)

Pick the template that matches your situation. Customise — never send a generic template verbatim. The committee will recognise a template instantly and treat it as low-effort.

Step 5: Get the email reviewed (Day 5)

Have someone else read it. We at Kadamb Overseas review negotiation drafts for our clients within 24 hours. If you are doing this solo, get a professor in your network or a senior who is already in Europe to read it.

Step 6: Send the email Monday-Wednesday morning Central European Time (Day 6)

Tuesday or Wednesday 9-10 AM CET is the highest-open-rate window. Avoid Monday morning (committee is buried in weekend backlog) and avoid Friday afternoon (sits unread until next Tuesday). Use a clear, specific subject line: “Scholarship offer reference [Your ID] — request for review”.

Step 7: Wait 7 business days before any follow-up (Day 7-14)

Scholarship committees typically need 5-10 business days. Do not send a follow-up before day 8 — that signals desperation. If by day 14 you have no response, send ONE polite follow-up. If still no response by day 18, accept the original offer and move on.

Email Template 1: Counter-Offer (With a Competing Scholarship in Hand)

This is the highest-success-rate template. Use it when you have a documented competing offer.

Subject: Scholarship offer reference [Your Application ID] — request for review

Body:

Dear [Scholarship Coordinator Name],

Thank you very much for the admission and scholarship offer to the [Programme Name] for the [intake year] intake. I am genuinely excited about the prospect of joining [University Name] and working with [Specific lab / Professor name / module].

I am writing to request a review of the funding package, because I am also weighing an offer from [Competing University Name, e.g., “EPFL”] for their [Comparable Programme Name]. The two programmes are very close to each other on my list, and I would much prefer to accept [University Name] for [one specific academic reason — e.g., “the integration of the lab with the Munich automotive cluster”]. However, the funding gap between the two offers is significant:

• [University Name]: [base stipend amount] + [tuition status] = €[total annual value]
• [Competing University Name]: [base stipend amount] + [tuition status] + [extras] = €[total annual value]

The difference is approximately €[X]/year, which translates to roughly ₹[Y] over the two-year programme.

Would it be possible for the scholarship committee to review the funding package and consider any of the following:

1. A research/teaching assistantship attached to [Specific Professor]’s lab

2. A one-time relocation grant for international students from outside the EU

3. Eligibility for the [Deutschlandstipendium / Lab-specific top-up / similar fund]

I have attached the competing offer letter for verification. The acceptance deadline for the [Competing University Name] offer is [date], so any indication by [date – 5 days] would help me make an informed choice. I would be deeply grateful for any review you can extend.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Warm regards,

[Your Name]

[Programme Name]

Application ID: [ID]

+91 [phone number]

Why this works: Specific competing university, specific amounts, specific asks, attached evidence, polite deadline pressure, one clear academic reason for preference. Roughly 60% of our Kadamb clients using this template at Tier-2 universities have received some form of top-up.

Email Template 2: No Counter-Offer, Financial-Need Appeal

Use this when you do not have a competing offer but have a documented financial-hardship case.

Subject: Scholarship offer reference [Your Application ID] — financial review request

Body:

Dear [Scholarship Coordinator Name],

Thank you very much for the admission and scholarship offer to the [Programme Name]. I am thrilled at the opportunity to join [University Name].

I am writing to request a review of my financial-aid package in light of circumstances I would like to bring to your attention. [Specific documented hardship — one paragraph, factual, not emotional. E.g., “My father, who was the primary earner in my family, was diagnosed with [condition] in [month/year] and is no longer able to work. I have attached the medical certificate and the most recent income statement.”]

The scholarship I have been awarded of €[amount]/year is generous, but the gap between this and the estimated cost of living in [City] of €[city cost-of-living estimate, e.g., €15,000]/year leaves a shortfall of approximately €[X]/year, which translates to roughly ₹[Y] over the two-year programme. With the change in our family financial situation, this shortfall cannot be covered through family support or my parents’ assets.

Would it be possible for the committee to consider:

1. Top-up via the [University Hardship Fund / Studierendenwerk / equivalent]

2. Eligibility for a research/teaching assistantship for the second semester

3. A reference to any external scholarship the university partners with

I have already applied for an Indian education loan of ₹[amount] from [SBI/HDFC/Axis] and the loan-approval letter is attached. I am also prepared to take on student employment within the EU work-rules (20 hours/week) once enrolled.

I deeply appreciate any review you can extend.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

[Programme Name]

Application ID: [ID]

+91 [phone number]

Why this works: Documented hardship (not vague), specific shortfall number, specific asks for existing funds (not invented ones), evidence of self-help (loan, willingness to work). Success rate around 35% at Tier-2 universities. For more on Indian education loan structuring, see our SBI/HDFC/Axis/Prodigy education loan comparison and the Europe 8-destination EMI calculator.

Email Template 3: Last-Resort Emotional Appeal (Use Sparingly)

Use this only when templates 1 and 2 are not available to you AND the funding gap is genuinely large enough that you cannot accept the offer. This template has a low success rate (~10%) but does sometimes unlock discretionary funds.

Subject: Scholarship offer reference [Your Application ID] — final request before decline

Body:

Dear [Scholarship Coordinator Name],

Thank you sincerely for the admission and scholarship offer to the [Programme Name]. I have spent the last [X weeks] working through whether I can accept, and I want to be transparent with the committee before the deadline.

After running every cost scenario with my family in Ahmedabad/[city], the funding gap of approximately €[X]/year exceeds what we can responsibly cover through education loan and family contribution combined. Without further support, I will reluctantly have to decline what is otherwise the strongest offer I have received.

Before I decline, I wanted to ask whether the committee would consider any discretionary review of the funding package, even a small top-up that closes part of the gap. I would also be open to a deferred intake of one year if that creates funding flexibility on the university side.

I want to emphasise that I am applying to [University Name] not for status but for very specific academic reasons — [one specific reason]. Declining this offer would be the most disappointing academic decision of my year. I hope the committee will understand my request and consider it in the spirit it is sent.

Thank you for everything you and the committee have done so far.

Warm regards,

[Your Name]

[Programme Name]

Application ID: [ID]

+91 [phone number]

Why this works (when it does): Honesty, specific gap number, a face-saving offer (deferred intake) that costs the committee nothing, genuine academic justification. Caveat: Use this template at most once per university. Sending a “final request” twice destroys your credibility.

What TO Say in Negotiation Emails (and What NEVER to Say)

Two specific anti-patterns we see Indian students fall into:

1. The “everyone’s doing it” fallacy. Mentioning that you read on Reddit or Yocket that “people negotiate scholarships all the time” is a credibility-killer. Each negotiation is treated on its own merits.

2. CC-ing the Dean. Some Indian students CC the Dean, the Programme Director, and three professors at once, thinking it adds weight. It does the opposite — committees see this as pressure tactics and harden against the request.

TU Munich, WU Vienna, KU Leuven: Where to Email and Who Replies

We get asked which specific desks to contact. Here is the verified information for our 3 most-negotiated universities.

TU Munich

• Scholarship coordinator desk: international.scholarships@tum.de
• Best for negotiation: Research assistantships via the chair’s secretary (look for “Sekretariat” on the lab page)
• Common top-up: Wissenschaftliche Hilfskraft contract (€11.32/hour, 8-19 hours/week)
• Best month to negotiate: May-July (TUM scholarship cycle has discretionary funds released in Q2)
• Avoid: Negotiating after August 15 — most scholarship budgets locked for autumn intake
• Response time: 5-12 business days

For a deeper guide on TU Munich’s full ecosystem and how IIT/NIT graduates are placed there, see our IIT/NIT to ETH and TU Munich transition paths and our Germany country hub.

WU Vienna (Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien)

• Scholarship coordinator desk: scholarships@wu.ac.at
• Best for negotiation: Ernst Mach Grant top-ups, OeAD-administered grants
• Common top-up: €2,000-€3,000 one-time relocation grant
• Best month to negotiate: April-June (Austrian academic year planning)
• Response time: 7-15 business days (Austrian universities respond slower than German ones)

For broader Austrian university selection, see our Austria country hub and our existing Germany vs Austria study comparison.

KU Leuven

• Scholarship coordinator desk: scholarship@kuleuven.be
• Best for negotiation: Science@Leuven Plus top-up, BOF (Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds) research grants
• Common top-up: €1,500-€3,000 added to Science@Leuven, or research-travel grant
• Best month to negotiate: February-April for the autumn intake (Belgian academic budget cycle)
• Response time: 7-12 business days

For Belgium-vs-Netherlands decision-making before you target KU Leuven, see our Netherlands vs Belgium English-medium Masters guide and our Belgium country hub.

How to Handle “We Cannot Increase the Amount” Responses

About 50% of negotiation emails receive a polite “we cannot increase the base scholarship” reply. This is not the end of the negotiation. The base scholarship cannot move, but adjacent funding usually can. Here is your second-round response template:

Subject: RE: Scholarship offer reference [Your Application ID] — alternate routes

Body:

Dear [Coordinator],

Thank you so much for the prompt response and for explaining the base scholarship constraints. I fully understand the budget structure.

Given that the base amount is fixed, would it be possible to explore any of the following alternate routes:

1. A research/teaching assistantship for the second semester onwards, linked to [Specific Professor]’s group

2. Eligibility for [University-specific fund — Deutschlandstipendium / BOF / DOC / similar]

3. A one-time international-student relocation grant

4. Conference/research-travel allowance under the [Specific lab’s project]

5. Tuition-fee waiver in addition to the existing stipend, if not already included

6. A deferred intake of [number] months in exchange for a slightly improved package

I am genuinely committed to joining [University Name] and would appreciate any of these routes that the committee can explore.

Thank you again for your time.

Warm regards,

[Your Name]

This second-round email succeeds about 40% of the time even after a “no” on the base amount. The trick is to offer the committee 5-6 yes/no decisions instead of one open-ended request — it makes their internal approval process faster.

Time Pressure Tactics and Deadline Extension Requests

If your acceptance deadline is approaching and the scholarship committee has not responded, you need to request a deadline extension before you negotiate. Here is the template:

Subject: Scholarship offer reference [Your Application ID] — deadline extension request

Body:

Dear [Admissions Coordinator],

Thank you for the offer to [Programme Name]. The current acceptance deadline is [date], and I would respectfully request a [10/14/21-day] extension to [new date].

The reason is that I have an outstanding scholarship-review request with [Scholarship Office contact] regarding my funding package, sent on [date]. I am awaiting their response before I can responsibly accept or decline.

I want to confirm that this extension request is not a sign of hesitation about the programme itself — I am very keen to join [University Name]. The decision is purely about whether the funding allows me to enrol without unsustainable family contribution.

I would be grateful for your understanding.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

European universities grant deadline extensions about 75% of the time when the reason is funding-related — they have seen this scenario many times.

The Rare Case Where Negotiation Lowers Your Offer

It happens, though rarely (we have seen 3 cases in 11 years). The mechanism is this: when you negotiate, the committee re-opens your file. If they re-evaluate and find that you have over-claimed something on your original application (e.g., a project you said was “published” was actually just submitted, or an internship duration you stated was longer than the certificate shows), they can revoke the offer or reduce the scholarship.

How to avoid this:

• Never claim anything on your application you cannot document in writing. Period.
• Do not negotiate if your original application has any rounding or generous interpretation. Better to keep the original offer than risk the audit.
• If you have a competing offer, verify the competing offer is genuine. Bluffing with a fake offer is a career-ending move in Europe — committees do informally cross-check with peer universities, especially at PhD level.

Tax Implications of a Negotiated Stipend

Many Indian students do not realise that the difference between a “scholarship” and a “salary” (e.g., research assistantship) has tax implications. Here is the snapshot for the 3 most common destinations.

Germany

• Pure scholarship (DAAD, Deutschlandstipendium, university stipend): Generally tax-free up to the BAföG-equivalent monthly amount (~€934 in 2026). Above this, the excess can be taxable.
• Wissenschaftliche Hilfskraft (research assistant) income: Taxable as employment income. Mini-job rule (Minijob, up to €556/month): tax-free if you stay under the cap. Midi-job (€556.01 – €2,000/month): reduced social-security contribution.
• Net rule of thumb: A €450/month Hilfskraft add-on to a €992 DAAD stipend lands you ~€1,442 gross, ~€1,400 net.

Austria

• Stipendien: Tax-free below the annual exempt limit (~€16,000 in 2026 for students).
• Wissenschaftliche Hilfskraft: Taxable, but the geringfügig threshold (~€551/month in 2026) keeps small jobs tax-free.

Belgium

• Scholarship (Bursalen-stipendia): Generally tax-free if linked to academic study.
• Wetenschappelijke Onderzoeker / PhD on research contract: Taxable as employment, but Belgium has a specific tax-favourable regime for early-stage researchers — the so-called bedrijfsvoorheffing reduction for PhD researchers can keep the effective rate around 12-15%.

If your negotiation switches part of your scholarship from “stipend” to “salary”, the net amount in your pocket may not increase proportionally to the gross — always compute the net before celebrating. We at Kadamb Overseas help our clients model the net cash-flow before accepting any modified offer.

A Real Kadamb Case Study: TU Munich + EPFL Counter

In the 2024 intake cycle, a Kadamb client (we will call her Aisha) was admitted to TU Munich Informatics with a €1,000/month TUM-specific stipend and parallel to EPFL Computational Science with a €1,600/month stipend. Both were autumn 2024 intake. Aisha preferred TU Munich for the Cremers lab’s computer vision focus, but the funding gap was €600/month or €7,200/year, roughly ₹6.5 lakh.

We drafted Template 1 with the EPFL offer attached, specifically requested a Hilfskraft contract with Cremers’ lab. The chair’s Sekretariat replied in 9 days offering a 12-hour/week Hilfskraft contract at €11.32/hour = €543/month gross, ~€530 net. Net funding gap reduced from €600 to €70/month. Aisha accepted TU Munich.

The takeaway: even a “no” on the base scholarship can become a near-full match through adjacent contracts. The Hilfskraft contract has tax and social-security implications we modelled with her before acceptance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Ready to Negotiate Your European Scholarship Offer?

If you have an admission and scholarship offer in hand from a European university and you want a second pair of expert eyes on it before you accept, Kadamb Overseas reviews scholarship offers for Indian Masters and PhD applicants. We have negotiated successful top-ups at TU Munich, KU Leuven, EPFL, WU Vienna, TU Delft, RWTH Aachen, Bocconi, KTH Stockholm, and many regional European universities.

WhatsApp Saumitra Rajput directly at +91 96876 88776 with a one-line summary of your offer (university + programme + scholarship amount + deadline) and we will get back within 24 hours with our initial assessment. Or visit our contact page to book a free 20-minute consultation.

Related Kadamb guides you may find useful as you finalise your offer:

• Hidden costs of European study for Indian families — the full sticker-shock list to model with parents
• European scholarship scam detection — 10 red flags — make sure your offer is real
• European student housing application from India — your next step after accepting
• What to pack for a 2-year European Masters from India — once funding is locked, get logistics right
• September 2027 intake timeline for Indian students — if you are planning the next intake
• Cheapest European countries to study for Indian students — if you are also weighing Tier-3 alternatives
• Free Europe study guides — full library

We at Kadamb Overseas, based in Ahmedabad and serving Indian students nationwide, have walked through this exact negotiation process with hundreds of students. The window to negotiate is short — usually 10-21 days. Move fast, move evidence-based, and you will often unlock an extra €1,000-€3,000 per year that pays for your flights and first semester’s rent.

About the Author

Saumitra Rajput

Founder & Europe Education Specialist | Kadamb Overseas Pvt. Ltd.

Saumitra Rajput is the founder of Kadamb Overseas Pvt. Ltd., India's leading Europe-focused study abroad consultancy based in Ahmedabad. With 14+ years of expertise in European education, he has personally counselled 2,500+ Indian families and helped 500+ students secure admission to top European universities including TU Munich, ETH Zurich, EPFL, KU Leuven, HEC Paris, Sapienza Rome, TU Wien, and Warsaw University of Technology. He has visited 25+ European universities, partners with 250+ EU institutions, and maintains a 97% visa success rate.

14+ Years Europe Education500+ Students Placed97% Visa SuccessDAAD ExpertCharpak Scholar MentorEPFL/ETH Admissions CoachItaly DSU SpecialistSchengen Visa Expert

💬 WhatsApp Saumitra📞 +91-99133 33239✉️ EmailView full profile

Planning to Study Abroad?

Get free expert guidance from our experienced counselors

Preferred CountryGermanyFranceItalyAustriaIrelandLithuaniaUnited KingdomAustraliaSwitzerlandNetherlandsOther Get Free Consultation

Saumitra Rajput

Saumitra Rajput is the founder and lead counsellor at Kadamb Overseas, India's trusted Europe education consultancy based in Ahmedabad. With 14+ years of hands-on experience, he has personally guided 500+ students to universities across Germany, Switzerland, France, Italy, Austria, and Spain. Saumitra has visited partner universities across Europe, holds deep expertise in European visa processes, scholarships, and student life, and has achieved a 97% visa success rate for his clients. He is the host of the YouTube channel "Europe with Saumitra", where he shares first-hand insights on studying and living in Europe. His mission: make Europe accessible to every Indian student, with zero consultancy fees.

Related Articles

• MBA in UK for Indian Students: Key Insights
• Application Requirements to study Masters in USA
• DAAD Scholarship 2026 for Indian Students: Complete Guide (Eligibility, Amount, How to Apply)
• Cost of Living in Ireland for Indian Students 2026: Complete Budget Guide
• Poland Summer Schools 2026: Programs, Fees & Application Guide for Indian Students